Critical Response #1

Description

In "Avant-Garde and Kitsch", Clement Greenberg offers an influential history of the emergence of "high" (avant-garde) and "low" (kitsch or popular) culture. He argues that popular culture is deceptive, often masquerading as "genuine" culture. This poses a threat to avant-garde culture.

Describe in your own words the difference between "genuine" (avant-garde) culture and kitsch, as articulated by Greenberg in this essay. In what sense does he think popular culture is a threat to high culture? Is this a legitimate concern? Do you agree with Greenberg's position? Why? On what basis? What are your reasons?

Note: Given that this is such a brief critical response, I suggest that you do not quote or refer to other authors. Stay close to Greenberg's text in your analysis and response.

Deadline

Essays are due at the beginning of class on Monday 26 September 05. Late papers will not be accepted.

Format

All papers must be no longer than 3 pages, typed on a computer and run through a spell-checker.

You will be evaluated on the form and content of your papers, so pay close attention to both appearance and grammar. All papers must be double-spaced with one-inch margins. If you need additional instructions or guidelines, see me.

You should also review the policy on academic honesty and let me know if you have questions about it.

T. R. Quigley