Frederic Jameson on Postmodernism
Two Linked Tendencies in Postmodernism.
1. Denial of
various boundaries, e.g. high culture vs. mass (popular) culture.
- "Postmodernism stage[s] itself as a kind of aesthetic
populism"
2. Reaction against
High Modernism.
- "the effacement of the older (essentially
high-modernist) frontier between high culture and so-called mass or commercial
culture"
Critique of the "Depth Model"
These
oppositions
a. essence/appearance
b. latent/manifest content
c. authenticity/inauthenticity
d. signifier/signified
"Death of the Subject" (End of
Individualism)
á
Modernism
valorizes personal style.
á
This
presupposes a unique individuality - a private identity or self (subject) -
that generates its own style according to a personal vision.
á
This
individualism is put into question in High (or Late) Modernism. The concept of the individual,
autonomous subject is looked upon as ideological.
á
This
presents us with an aesthetic problem:
If there are no individual, creative subjects, and nothing new is
possible, what is it that an artist does?
á
What
is left to the postmodern artist is the possibility of imitation - the
recycling of images and forms, i.e. pastiche.
á
With
the "Death of the Subject" comes the notion that "the Past"
is now unreachable. This adds a
historical component to the aesthetic problem.
Pastiche vs. Parody
á
Both
involve imitation of other styles.
á
Parody
mocks the original and ridicules it as excessive or eccentric, i.e outside the
norm. Thus, parody presupposes a
norm relative to which the original can be measured.
á
Pastiche
does not presuppose a basis or norm relative to which mockery (or value
judgments in general) can occur.
Thus, pastiche is a value neutral imitation, without laughter, guilt or
blame.
Schizophrenia (Postmodern Temporality)
Lacanian (structuralist) analysis of language and its role in the experience
of time.
a. Signifier, Signified, Referent: There is no unmediated (direct) access to reality. Thus, the referent drops out of the
analysis and we are left with the sign and its two remaining aspects.
b. Meaning (Signification) is not a one-to-one relation
between a word and its meaning.
Meaning emerges from a larger relationship, e.g. the sentence. This places the signifier in the
context of other signifiers. Thus,
meaning (the signified) emerges from the signifier/signifier relations.
c. "Schizophrenia is the breakdown of the relationship between
signifiers." ThatŐs because
the experience of temporality itself depends on language. The sense of personal identity, i.e. a
self that endures through time, is an effect of language. In fact, it is the very persistence of
language over time that makes it possible for us to have an experience of time
and, hence, of a continuous personal identity.
d. In the schizophrenic,
the language function is impaired and doesnŐt allow for this sense of temporal
duration and continuity.
Consequently, the schizophrenic has a more intense experience of the present moment since oneŐs focus of attention is not distributed over the
larger, related activities of oneŐs life.
(Non-schizophrenics conceive of themselves as involved in
"projects", i.e. larger purposes and plans within which the present
moment is situated. The extreme
schizophrenic has no sense of personal continuous identity, nor a sense of involvement
in a project.)
This intensification is experienced as a loss of reality. This loss can be thought
of as a signifier in isolation from other signifiers and, hence, cutoff from
the possibility of meaning. OneŐs
immediate perceptions become even more "material" and literal, i.e.
it becomes impossible to "see through the materiality of the language"
(e.g. the voice of a person who is speaking, the speaker's accent, the sounds
of the wind or birds, the ink on the page, etc.) This all confronts one as brute, material
objectness, unrelated and without meaning.
Cf. "China", photorealism, etc. (Signifier/signifier relations with the signified absent.)
This "postmodern schizophrenia" is related to a larger kind
of "historical amnesia" or loss of history in consumer society.
Conclusion
The Postmodern Sublime
"[S]omething elseÉtend[s] to
emerge in the most energetic post-modernist texts, and this is the sense that
beyond all thematics or content the work seems somehow to tap the networks of
the reproductive process and thereby to afford us some glimpse into a postmodern
or technological sublime, whose power or authenticity is documented by the
success of such works in evoking a whole new postmodern space in emergence
around us."
"[O]ur faulty representations of some immense communicational and computer
network are themselves but a distorted figuration of something even deeper,
namely, the whole world system of a present-day multinational capitalism."
We
must "make at least some effort to think the cultural evolution of late
capitalism dialectically, as catastrophe and progress all together."
"[W]e mustÉaffirm that the dissolution of an
autonomous sphere of culture is rather to be imagined in terms of an explosion:
a prodigious expansion of culture throughout the social realm, to the point at
which everything in our social life -- from economic value and state power to
practices and to the very structure of the psyche itself -- can be said to have
become "cultural" in some original and yet untheorized sense."
The Possibility of Political Art
"[T]he new political art (if it is possible at
all) will have to hold to the truth of postmodernism, that is to say, to its
fundamental object -- the world space of multinational capital -- at the same
time at which it achieves a breakthrough to some as yet unimaginable new mode
of representing this last, in which we may again begin to grasp our positioning
as individual and collective subjects and regain a capacity to act and struggle
which is at present neutralized by our spatial as well as our social
confusion."
© T. R. Quigley, 2002